剛好看到智財所老師的訪問，我將重點記錄下來加上自己的想法。
1. 訴訟多時，可能會耗3~5年，甚至7~8年， ITC後還有聯邦法院
1. 訴訟多時，可能會耗3~5年，甚至7~8年， ITC後還有聯邦法院
2. 耗費大量資金，導致資源分散，不能專注在研發、行銷上
3. 耗費大量資源在訴訟上，研發必須耗費時間避開專利，耗費人力資源與時間成本
4. HTC的確有其關鍵專利，Apple沒有把握能打贏訴訟
5. 藉著HTC的關鍵專利，Apple能夠應用到自家產品上(HTC生產了全世界第一支LTE手機)
6. 集中資源，對抗Samsung
7. Apple認為HTC就算沒有專利訴訟也沒有威脅
8. 領導人風格不同，Tim Cook並不像Steve jobs要將Android趕盡殺絕
1. It takes too much time, maybe 3 to 8 years (ITC then USC).
2. Huge cost on litigation. Can't put money focusing on R&D and marketing
3. Resources are distributed, the people resource and time cost are wasted. For instance, R&D must work around on infringed patents.
4. HTC indeed has critical patents, Apple has no 100% confidence to win this litigation.
5. Using the critical patents of HTC, Apple can apply on i series (HTC creates first LTE phone in the world).
6. Gather all resource to fight against Samsung.
7. Apple thinks even settle with HTC, it doesn't matter. HTC is not a threat to Apple.
8. Different leadership between Tim Cook and Steve Jobs. Steve Jobs hates Android deeply and will not negotiate with Android alliance, but Tim Cook doesn't.
8. 領導人風格不同，Tim Cook並不像Steve jobs要將Android趕盡殺絕
1. It takes too much time, maybe 3 to 8 years (ITC then USC).
2. Huge cost on litigation. Can't put money focusing on R&D and marketing
3. Resources are distributed, the people resource and time cost are wasted. For instance, R&D must work around on infringed patents.
4. HTC indeed has critical patents, Apple has no 100% confidence to win this litigation.
5. Using the critical patents of HTC, Apple can apply on i series (HTC creates first LTE phone in the world).
6. Gather all resource to fight against Samsung.
7. Apple thinks even settle with HTC, it doesn't matter. HTC is not a threat to Apple.
8. Different leadership between Tim Cook and Steve Jobs. Steve Jobs hates Android deeply and will not negotiate with Android alliance, but Tim Cook doesn't.
